On 2012/06/12, at 4:20, ext Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > On 11 June 2012 09:21, João Abecasis <joao.abeca...@nokia.com> wrote: >> Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: >>> On 11 June 2012 00:49, <tasuku.suz...@nokia.com> wrote: >>>> Disabling PCRE makes sense for me. As we have QT_NO_REGEXP already, add it >>>> to feature list and fix the build. >>> >>> To be ultra pedantic, perhaps QT_NO_REGEXP should be renamed into >>> samething like QT_NO_REGULAREXPRESSION for selectively disabling >>> PCRE+QRegularExpression (butkeeping QRegExp)? >> >> I'm not sure we should allow QRegExp to be used when there is no >> QRegularExpression, as we want code to move over to using >> QRegularExpression, not the other way around. > > Sure -- I was purely talking in terms of "individual features" to > compile in: QRegExp and QRegularExpression are independent and > therefore could be individually disabled…
Yeah, I was wrong. We should have QT_NO_REGULAREXPRESSION for PCRE + QRegularExpression. QRegExp should be disabled by QT_NO_REGEXP or QT_NO_DEPRECATED if it will be marked as deprecated. -- Tasuku Suzuki _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
