On 19.06.2012 09:39, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On terça-feira, 19 de junho de 2012 09.21.46, Peter Kümmel wrote: >> On 19.06.2012 08:44, Thiago Macieira wrote: >>> Yes, I know about it. No, I did not look at it. I cannot do that because I >>> need to write code of my own. I cannot look at other people's code and >>> submit to the Qt Project under the CLA, unless it's in the public domain. >> You must not read other code?! Then sorry for the link. Hope you could >> everybody convince you haven't clicked on the link, at least when your eyes >> were open ;) > > If I read their code and then implement a vector soon after or at the same > time, one could argue that I copied their code onto Qt. That's why I don't do > it. >
So even no Apache licensed code could be used within Qt? Sound like Qt's version of "not invented here". >>> What's more, lock-free is a technique for making thread-safe containers. >>> Qt >>> containers are not meant to be that. And when you say "at some places it >>> uses lock-free", it implies that in other places it doesn't, >>> which means those places use locks and that's not acceptable. >> >> I don't know what code is thread save. Seems the vector is not, like yours. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Development mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
