On Wednesday 20. June 2012 11.25.28 ext Peter Kümmel wrote:
> On 20.06.2012 11:09, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> >> static const char qt_meta_stringdata_Foo<int>[] = {
> >>
> >> "Foo<int>\0\0t\0asignal(int)\0"
> >>
> >> };
> >
> > That's because you are looking at Qt4.
> > In Qt5 it is could be something more like "Foo<T>\0asignal\0\0T\0t\0"
> >
> > And you can connect using the new pointer function syntax.
> > And some little changes would be required to the other syntax for it to
> > work, but it should be possible (as now, the "signature" of the signal
> > is only reconstructed at runtime)
> >
> > Foo<int> foo;
> > connect(&foo,&Foo<int>::asignal, this,&Bar::setInt);
> > connect(&foo, SIGNAL(signal(int)), this, SLOT(setInt(int)));
>
> OK, connection would work. But what I mean is, from the meta type
> perspective Foo<int> and Foo<double> would have the same meta type.
> Therefore the idea to use specialization, then you could define
> qt_meta_stringdata_Foo for each type.
>
> Peter
Just a side note. From c++ and qt meta type perspective Foo<int> and
Foo<double> are unrelated and completely different types.
Jędrek
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
