Hi, >> I assume that classes using a QSharedDataPointer are movable, correct? > Yes, but we have to mark them each as such. I meant "are candidates for marking as movable" ;-)
> Yes, but I'm afraid of that recommendation in our docs. It may be read and > used by people who don't know exactly what movable is and their types aren't > movable. I think that people who care about QSharedDataPointer for optimizing stuff should be able to understand the implications. What about something like this: "If your data class uses a QSharedDataPointer/QExplicitlySharedDataPointer as the only member you should consider marking your data class as a movable type (link to Q_DECLARE_TYPEINFO) in order to improve performance when using Qt's container classes." Nils _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
