On Jul 3, 2012 10:04 PM, <lorn.pot...@nokia.com> wrote: > > QML was started long before Nokia bought Trolltech. > > To answer your question, my opinion is No, QML should not be removed. >
Lorn, so you think it should be allowed that Qt Modules are not interoperable? Also, did QML in the Trolltech days have javascript hacked on and forced-JIT in the design? There's a 3rd option that I intentionally didn't mention that is actually a sensible home for QML: .ui file replacement. Currently QML depends too much on itself to be a .ui file replacement. There is no C++ equivalent of much of the functionality in QML, whereas everything you can do in a .ui file, you can do in C++. d3fault
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
