On Thursday July 5 2012, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quarta-feira, 4 de julho de 2012 23.09.03, Marc Mutz wrote: > > Any opinions either way? > > There are no plans to write any class to replace QFuture. However, renaming > the class right now is close to impossible due to source-compatibility > requirements.
Ok, then I would request permission to move QFuture from QtConcurrent to QtCore/threads, so users will be able to use it with QPromise and any thread-pool in 5.1. I'll prepare a patch if there's no opposition. Thanks, Marc -- Marc Mutz <marc.m...@kdab.com> | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development