On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 01:50:42PM +1000, Alan Alpert wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 03:18:02 ext André Pönitz wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:02:33AM +1000, Alan Alpert wrote: > > > The theory is that you're not trying to maintain a single codebase > > > for both QML1 and QML2. > > > > [Maybe it's about time to run reality checks on certain theories > > anyway...] > > It's a major version change, what did you expect? It's a pain to > maintain even a QWidget application for a single Qt 4 and Qt 5 > code-base, [...]
This is incidentally one of those theories in need of a reality check I was refering to. The assumption is wrong, as proven by the example of Qt Creator. After some initial effort to make it compile with Qt 5 at all (mostly due to the modularization and the Gui/Widget schism) it compiles rather nicely with Qt 4 and Qt 5 from a single code base without much #ifdef hackery. It is definitely maintainable in that form. Good old Qt stuff. Create once, deploy everywhere. Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
