On Wednesday, July 18, 2012 14:00:08 Marc Mutz wrote: > The question is just: which one is more work? And frankly, no-one knows, > because there's no experience with inline namespaces (even though GCC uses > something similar for the debug STL containers for a long time).
I believe the llvm community libc++ uses inline namespaces, but that might not have the widespread use and multiple versions required to really get the required experience. I don't think breaking binary compatibility in a 5.x release is a good idea. As was said previously, if it's Qt 6, call it Qt 6. Thanks, -- Stephen Kelly <stephen.ke...@kdab.com> | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
