On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Alessandro Portale <alessan...@casaportale.de> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:58 PM, John Layt <jl...@kde.org> wrote: >> Do we really need to do this in 5.0? > > +1 > > Do we really need to rush with this?
I'm not even sure QImage is the right class for more serious color/imaging work, It's certainly useful to have more imaging support including color profile handling, metadata reading/writing/modifications, efficient loading of large images, other color spaces (16 bit or floating point linear space, YUV, Lab, CMYK). All this would certainly be useful, but those features don't really fit the current QImage purpose, maybe starting the new QtImaging module would be more appropriate? Regards Dmytro. > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
