On Aug 26, 2012, at 3:47 PM, ext Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> wrote:
> On domingo, 26 de agosto de 2012 15.44.05, Thiago Macieira wrote: >> With a Double CAS, it might be possible to do that for the Windows and Mac >> semaphore solutions. PThread also allows for static initialisation, but it >> requires a destruction call if the mutex is used > > And all of this is so we don't have to run a destructor... That's why I'm > saying that we're imposing constraints on the much-more-often used QMutex so > that the less-often QBasicMutex can exist. Which is why I'm asking whether they shouldn't be separate classes sharing as much of the implementation as possible. Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
