31.08.2012, 15:54, "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macie...@intel.com>:
> Finally, this *was* a subjective choice: mine. I want to drive adoption of
> newer, better technology. LZMA is a great improvement over the compression
> technologies used so far and the xz format is getting interesting adoption.

LZMA really "is a great improvement over the compression" if we talk about
compression of binaries. It's undoubtfully *the best* available open source
compression algorithm here. But for source archives difference with bz2 is not 
so
drastic.

> Many thanks to Julian Seward for bzip2 (among other projects he's contributed
> to), but xz is producing smaller packages nowadays.
>
> So, I'd say that our position is: stop complaining and upgrade. If you can't
> upgrade, there's .gz and you'll pay the penalty by increased disk space in
> your system.
>
> --
> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
>   Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
>      Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
>      Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
>
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

-- 
Regards,
Konstantin
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to