At lease, I think the 'dev' is not a good name for remote branch. Does it mean the other branch is in no--active-developing state? I prefer using 'feature' instead. All the new feature should go 'feature' branch. and the 'stable' is only bug fix branch.
2012/9/28 Lincoln Ramsay <a1291...@gmail.com> > Luckily we use git so you can give the branches any name you want on your > local repo :) > -- *Please don't ask where I come from, It's a shame!* Best Regards Yuchen
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
