On segunda-feira, 1 de outubro de 2012 09.37.06, Stephen Kelly wrote: > On Sunday, September 30, 2012 17:13:14 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > We followed clang's recommendation to static_cast to void*. Clang can't > > complain that we're doing exactly what it suggested we do. > > Could you say more about this recommendation?
What more is there to say? The output from the compiler without the cast to
void* is in the commit message.
> Was the recommendation made in response to us asking for a warning work-
> around? If so, and we're now stuck with another warning, we're no better
> off.
It looks like the workaround that it suggested does not work. Or did not work.
I hope it's just a matter of different clang versions.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
