On Oct 9, 2012, at 4:32 PM, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote:
> On terça-feira, 9 de outubro de 2012 14.12.16, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: >> On 9 October 2012 13:03, Joerg Bornemann <joerg.bornem...@digia.com> wrote: >>> There's AFAIK no "short cut" for pure localhost TCP >>> connections. >> >> There are. For instance, checksums are not computed nor checked for >> packets travelling through the loopback interface. > > Also, the MTU and buffer sizes are higher, but it's still not as optimal as > Unix sockets. > > What you're asking for is an intermediate base between QAbstractSocket and > QIODevice, but I'm not sure how much it's worth. What methods from > QAbstractSocket do you need which are also common (same signature) between > that and QLocalSocket? And why would one need polymorphism here? If the methods are named the same and behave the same, it's a matter of changing the class name to move from local to TCP or back. Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
