On Thursday 11 October 2012 23:06:18 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On sexta-feira, 12 de outubro de 2012 07.27.51, Marc Mutz wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I was wondering whether we should stop using the pattern of declaring > > _q_privateSlots() in favour of connecting to functors or functions > > directly. > Makes sense, except that it's of inconvenient use: > - lambdas: can't use in Qt code > - functors: inconvenient (need to be out of the class) > - static member or free functions: will not have access to the target > object - private member functions: disallowed by Qt coding guidelines
That is indeed a problem: it is not possible to connect to member function of a QObjectPrivate, only QObject. One could add an overload (or even a QObjectPrivate::connect) that connect to a QObjectPrivate function. >From the implementation point of view it is just a matter of adding a QPrivateSlotObject inhartiting from QSlotBase. -- Olivier Woboq - Qt services and support - http://woboq.com _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
