On quinta-feira, 18 de outubro de 2012 18.05.31, Ziller Eike wrote: > I'd throw Mac out of sentences that have Linux in them in this discussion: > There are no "Mac" distributions/distributors that package Qt
There's MacPorts. > On Mac, Qt will either be self-compiled (you are on your own which is fine), > or installed through our binary installers - which will install different > Qt versions (version + tool chain specific) into different directories > (http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt5_beta2_component_tree) so there is no > conflict either. Same situation like on Windows, except that Windows has > the environment set up thingies. That's the SDK hierarchy. The Libraries Only install does a global install with frameworks, but frameworks suffers from not being renameable. > Developers who distribute their Qt application on Windows and Mac usually > ship a private Qt copy with their application --> no conflict. But even if > they install Qt systemwide, we are using frameworks on Mac which > automatically do versioning for major versions if done right, and we are > adding the major version to dlls on Windows already. Yup. What I haven't understood yet is how you select a different version besides "Current" in Mac frameworks. > The only thing that would be solved is how Linux distributors can install > multiple (major) versions of Qt simultaneously. Right. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development