On 2012-10-19, André Pönitz <andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de> wrote: >> Really. I really want, both as a Qt contributor and a Qt packager to >> ship a pristine Qt. Please help me make it happen.
> Demanding to be relieved from that burden is one thing. Demanding to > use an approach that will break thousands of other projects is a > different one. It is unreasonable. I am a bit saddened by this paragraph. I'm not demanding anything. I'm *explaining* my situation *hoping* that we can do something. I could also be *begging* if *you* would prefer that, but I wouldn't expet that. I do know that I can't *demand* anything. I do know, though, that the only way Qt can ensure the same is done on all distributions is to solve it in Qt. I will try hard, if the distributions need to solve it, to ensure that most distros implement it the same way. but I also can't demand anything there. And I have already heard people saying that qmake-qt5 is a much better name. Oh. btw, whattabout a solution with all tools having a 5 suffixed in /usr/bin and then creating a symlink farm somewhere with unversioned tools for people who has special needs? /Sune _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
