On Sunday, October 21, 2012 10:51:12 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > All correct? Did I miss anything? > > More or less. I was thinking it might work if it's inside the qtbase > sources.
> If distros are going to provide Qt 5, they need to compile qtbase > anyway. The only thing we need is to provide a way for the wrapper from qt5 > to be suppressed if the qt6 one is being installed. Something for packagers to chime in on. > > Preferably also list goals and non goals. For example Sune's concern that > > I > > linked to before seems to have become a non-goal. Please make those things > > explicit. > > What concern? See my mail from this morning in reply to you. It relates to user support. Thanks, -- Stephen Kelly <stephen.ke...@kdab.com> | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions ** Qt Developer Conference: http://qtconference.kdab.com/ **
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development