On segunda-feira, 22 de outubro de 2012 19.02.38, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > 22.10.2012, 18:49, "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macie...@intel.com>: > > I just have no idea how one thing relates to the other. Can you share a > > little more about how this solves a problem that you were seeing? > > It provides a sane way of coexisting for 2 moc executables for the same Qt > version. E.g. someone can register different moc executable for some Qt > version and it will work immediately with old makefiles. > > Otherwise the only option is to overwrite existing moc with no fallback > possibility. > > It also makes possible to have one moc working for several Qt versions.
That was not part of my plans and I will not add that feature. There's exactly one moc executable per Qt version. If you want to change to a moc-llvm implementation, you need to do renaming of files, just like you did before. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
