On 10/24/2012 01:12 AM, d3fault wrote: > On 10/23/12, Lincoln Ramsay <[email protected]> wrote: >> We're not renaming things or creating new lists just to match the >> names you think we should have. >> > > *sigh*, I had a feeling someone would say something like that. > > The changes are trivial at a glance, yes.... > ...but what the Qt Project officially endorses/recommends is the real > change here. > > Right now, the Qt Project instructs analysts use > security-through-obscurity when reporting vulnerabilities.
Lars and Charles both provided good lists of reasons in another part of this thread for going with the policy of Responsible Disclosure. Clearly you disagree on the weighting of the pros and cons, but it doesn't seem like you're able to convince anyone else about the superiority of your position. At what point will you accept that? -- Samuel _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
