On 01/11/12 09:41, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quinta-feira, 1 de novembro de 2012 09.23.37, Lincoln Ramsay wrote:
>> On 01/11/12 01:02, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>>> Also, do I understand correctly that you're suggesting that multiarch
>>>
>>> distributions should have *both*:
>>>     /usr/lib/qt5//bin/assistant             AND             
>>> /usr/lib64/qt5/bin/assistant
>>>     /usr/lib/qt5//bin/linguist              AND             
>>> /usr/lib64/qt5/bin/linguist
>>>     /usr/lib/qt5//bin/designer              AND             
>>> /usr/lib64/qt5/bin/designer
>> hang on... why shouldn't they have both of those?
>>
>> a 32-bit assistant is different to a 64-bit assistant
> How are they different?

Well for one thing, you can't run the 32-bit one against a 64-bit 
install or vice versa. Any plugins they load (including system style 
plugins) must be the same bit-ness. Designer used to load plugins for 
custom widgets... not sure if it still does.

If you're on a 64-bit distro, you most likely don't want the 32-bit 
versions. If you're on a 32-bit distro, you can't use the 64-bit ones. 
That's a distro/packaging problem though. The best we could do is to 
remove these from the Qt repo and build/packge them separately (like we 
do with Creator).

-- 
Link

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to