On quinta-feira, 8 de novembro de 2012 11.02.23, Alan Alpert wrote: > I know commits go to Qt5 first, but with the issue of QtQuick there's > different implementations for QtQuick 1 and QtQuick 2. I don't think > it's a good idea for QtQuick 1 (Qt 5) to gain new features that are > withheld from QtQuick 1 (Qt 4), so if the feature is too big to add to > Qt 4.x, then it should just skip QtQuick 1. Which is not too appealing > until Qt 5 is out and QtQuick 2 is actually in use.
I don't agree to that. I think the feature can be added to Qt Quick 1 in Qt 5 and not added to the older version in Qt 4. But, if it's relevant, it should be added to Qt Quick 2 too (first?) -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
