> There haven't been too much discussion about different Linux > configurations, But as you can see from list of currently CI tested > configurations there are quite many of them. Personally I'm thinking > that we should remove Ubuntu > 10.04 or at least reduce the number of tested configurations from 2 to > 1 and use that HW capacity to extended testing of different Windows > configurations and possibly static builds of Qt. That said my > suggestion for Qt 5 Linux CI configurations is: > > linux-g++-32_Ubuntu_10.04_x86 (possibly to be removed) > linux-arm-gnueabi-g++_Ubuntu_11.10_x86 > linux-g++_shadow-build_Ubuntu_11.10_x86 > linux-g++_developer-build_qtnamespace_qtlibinfix_Ubuntu_11.10_x64 > linux-g++_no-widgets_Ubuntu_12.04_x64 > linux-g++developer-build_static_Ubuntu_12.04_x64 (new) >
10.04 LTS is more important than 11.10, as it gives test coverage of a different window manager and the 0.9 openSSL libraries. I'd say to drop 11.10 if anything, since it is very similar to 12.04 LTS. If keeping only one configuration on a platform, keep the developer build since it has more test coverage than the production build. This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the e-mail by you is prohibited. Where allowed by local law, electronic communications with Accenture and its affiliates, including e-mail and instant messaging (including content), may be scanned by our systems for the purposes of information security and assessment of internal compliance with Accenture policy. ______________________________________________________________________________________ www.accenture.com _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
