On sexta-feira, 16 de novembro de 2012 23.46.32, Tony Van Eerd wrote: > C++1y (ie whatever the next standard might be called) will likely have even > more threading options. Including an "executor" model where you queue up > std::functions to be run on background thread(s). But the background > threading is "configurable" by the fact that the executor object isn't > completely hidden from you (like it is with std::async(), etc). > > Maybe we should model something along those lines. I've used that model > quite successfully in the past. > > I can probably find the current proposal(s) in the standards committee if > anyone is interested.
We can't wait for C++1y, but we should instead try and influence it by designing something nice. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
