>> I would also consider an even simpler API. How about we introduce a new
>> keyword for persistent properties and make it part of the language.
>>
>> Rectangle {
>> id: root
>> persistent property width: 400
>> persistent property height: 300
>> }
>>
>> What this means is that the application will automatically store its
>> persistent properties on exit and recall those properties on startup. By
>> default they would be initialised to the bound value.
>> It will need some attached properties or other meta data to override default
>> storage locations etc. And we also need to enforce id's to keep values
>> unique per qml file.
>>
>> Jens
> Interesting idea, but isn't that a recipe for horror if you ever want to
> change the structure of your application? To make it possible to keep
> your application settings if you change your application structure, you
> will need to set those attached properties. A default generated value
> will not suffice. That either leads to forcing users to set it if they
> use the persistent keyword, or leading them into big trouble with
> application maintenance in the future. Neither sounds attractive.
You certainly have a valid point and I agree that the persistent property will
need an explicit name.
There are several ways we could try to amend it though:
Using special syntax:
Rectangle {
persistent property int width: ["application.width", 400]
persistent property int height: ["application.height", 400]
}
Or perhaps get rid of the keyword altogether and just do:
Rectangle {
property int width: Qt.storedProperty("application.width", 400)
property int height: Qt.storedProperty("application.height", 400)
}
Jens
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
