On 12/17/2012 03:24 PM, Turunen Tuukka wrote: > > On 17.12.2012 15.55, "Peter Hartmann" <phartm...@rim.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> would it be possible to get an own 4.8-blackberry10 branch on gitorious >> in the qt repo (https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qt), similar to the >> 4.8.0-symbian branch that still exists?
The way this worked for Symbian (AFAIK) was that they were pushing their changes to 4.8 and once they were integrated they cherry-pick them into their branch. I don't think this was meant to have their own changes without being in the 4.8 branch first. >> The thing is for BlackBerry 10 we are working as close to upstream (i.e. >> 4.8 branch) as possible, but due to some features we needed that are >> hard to get into 4.8 (e.g. >> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,39135) and turnaround time for >> getting patches into Qt 4 (+ getting them into Qt 5 first), it would be >> good if we had an own dedicated branch for it. >> >> We could point people to it in case they want to compile Qt themselves >> for BlackBerry 10, and make sure everybody working on it (us and KDAB) >> is using exactly the same branch. >> >> Alternatively I guess we could just clone the repo into a team clone. >> >> Peter > > We can discuss this, but personally I am not that fond of creating > platform specific branches. I think the drawbacks of these clearly > outweight the benefits in long run. > > If your problem is mainly turnaround time for getting things in it may be > due to many being busy with getting Qt 5.0.0 out. In general we are still > welcoming improvements to 4.8 as long as they are not behavioral or public > API changes. I think this is related to the CI time and CI (or flaky test) failures. Cheers, -- Sergio Ahumada Release Engineer - Digia, Qt _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development