On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 10:35:04 Alan Alpert wrote: > > But I still think the action needs a name, which can be used by the > > image provider to find the icon. (This is independent of whether the > > image provider uses files or resources; the icon will be found by name > > either way.) Maybe we can reuse objectName for that. So the action > > is just called "open" but the image provider can go looking for > > icon-open-action.png or something, using its own naming convention. > > The point of that is to avoid repeating yourself in QML. > > objectName has its uses, don't just give it an extra meaning. I see no > problem with adding a separate actionName or name property if that's > helpful, despite the presence of objectName.
I agree. In particular, using objectName for both the name of the action and automatically for part of the name of the icon seems like a bad idea to me. Thanks, -- Stephen Kelly <stephen.ke...@kdab.com> | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
