On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 07:19:19 -0600, Glen Mabey wrote: >> Something I was missing several times is a 2D container. Qt has objects >> organized in rows and columns ( QTable, QImage ... ) - so IMHO it is >> related to Qt. >> >> But I would expect to find a class with an API comparable to QVector. > > Yes, if the container object is strictly 2D, then I think that the API > would probably be much like that of QVector.
I bet this would cover 98% of all use cases ( Qt is a 2D toolkit ) and usually it doesn't need to have any maths. The motivation of such a class is simply that you can build better APIs when you can copy implicitly shared 2D Arrays and access them with row, column indexes. Of course that doesn't mean, that the other 2% are not important enough to have another container like yours. Uwe _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development