> -----Original Message----- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia....@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia....@qt-project.org] On > Behalf Of Martin Sandsmark > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 3:38 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] QtMultimedia BIC / header cleanliness issue > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 02:56:27PM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > this isn't about a cover-up, but about not making a fuss about a > > virtual non-event (no pun intended). changelog entries, etc. are ok > > (like for any bugfix), while changing the soversion seems just a bit over > > the > top. > > Why is bumping the so-version a lot of fuss?
It makes the file name out of line with the other .so file names. There's a good chance that this will break some deployment scripts which do just cpy "lib*.5.so" ... Question the other way round: What do we gain from bumping the version, except for the feeling that we've 'done the right thing"? I understood that the chances anyone really running into this bc are miniscule. Regards Kai _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
