On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Thiago A. Corrêa <thiago.cor...@gmail.com>wrote:
> IMHO we could drop the enumeration from the public API. What would you use for setting a conrete value for your serialport like the terminal example demonstrates that use case? > I'm not native english > speaker but I think writting it as baudrate (ie, as a single word) is > common[1], and therefore I guess it wouldn't be against the convention > to call it baudrate/setBaudrate if that form os prefered. > I believe that camelCase makes sense here as they are usually as separate words (i.e. even if I type "baudrate" into Google). > If we keep the enumeration, then Baud9600 isn't a bad name. > Fine, I will make a patch soon then if there are no objections against it. [1] I've looked up an Oxford Semi datasheet I have here and it's > written only as baud rate, but another one from Atmel has both forms. > Hmm, perhaps the link is missing. ;-) Thank you for your feedback. Laszlo
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
