On segunda-feira, 28 de janeiro de 2013 17.03.39, Rutledge Shawn wrote: > On 28 Jan 2013, at 5:39 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote: > > On 2013-01-28, Knoll Lars <lars.kn...@digia.com> wrote: > >>>> 1) always with -developer-build > >>>> 2) on by default on -developer-build, but the CI disables it > >>>> 3) completely optional, CI enables it > >>>> 4) completely optional, not enabled by the CI > >> > >> I'd favor (2) for now, and move over to (1) once we gained a little > >> experience with it for the compilation of the whole module. The header > >> compilation test should probably move to (1) immediately.> > > Can something in the 'middle' be done where CI somehow yells at > > people who introduces new warnings? > > That could maybe be another bot like the doc and sanity bots. Or maybe the > sanity bot could do it.
I'd rather skip that step and simply go to -Werror. Lars proposed that we experiment with it a little and see how far it goes before turning it on. The good thing about -Werror is that the failure comes fast. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
