>I'm very much in favour of opening this up. I think the Qt Project can only win with a more liberal policy here.
I am glad to hear, and I have impatiently since waited for something to happen, since I would really like to have access to re-open and close bugs. I think it is annoying that I have to poke people with something needs to be closed (or re-open and closed) due some Gerrit changes. >I don't think we should be afraid of someone closing a valid bug by accident. That does indeed seem pretty unlikely and (like Frederik stated) watchers of the bug will probably catch such a mistake fast, and if everyone can re-open a bug then it seems like a no problem. If somebody by accident closes a valid bug in jira and no-one notice, then it really can't be a high priority problem ... (Furthermore Re-open for everybody shouldn't be a problem either. I assume it is theoretic that people will keep re-opening things that is won't/can't fix .. but even if it became a problem, it is far better to have such a problem than having 10 reports about the same) So I would like to +1 for Frederik Gladhorns suggestion. However a (clear) decision will have to be made (the sooner the better :) ) - and if it involves work then someone needs to be assigned that task ... regards Thorbjørn
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
