On 3/4/13 13:16 , Samuel Rødal wrote: > On 03/04/2013 01:08 PM, Sorvig Morten wrote: >> >> On Mar 4, 2013, at 8:13 AM, Samuel Rødal <samuel.ro...@digia.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> What about things such as offscreen platform plugins used for >>> testing? Or what about a theoretical platform plugin that would >>> stream rendering commands to somewhere else? Imagine running >>> wayland clients on Mac or Windows for instance, with the server >>> being a Linux machine. Or a platform plugin that lets you run >>> your Qt applications inside Second Life. >>> >>> There might be these and other use cases on Windows and Mac in >>> the future, so I wouldn't recommend going back to the Qt 4 way of >>> thinking. >> >> I don't think this is a problem in practice since you can run >> against e.g. Wayland on on Mac and still link against >> ApplicationServices. Of course, the native conversion functions >> would be of little use then. > > True, so conversion to from "plain" structures such as CGRect etc is > probably not a big deal. Let's however not expose any platform > plugin implementation details in the QtCore / QtGui APIs.
Agreed. Also, as a data point, QtCore already links to ApplicationServices. Tor Arne _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
