On segunda-feira, 4 de março de 2013 17.25.35, André Somers wrote: > QFuture<T> runFunction(QFunction<T> then, QFunction<T> main); > QFuture<T> runFunction(QFuntion<void> then, QFuntion<T> main); > QFuture<T> runFunction(QFunction<T> main);
I think this is going too far. If you want to chain jobs, we need a more
complex job tracker. That's what ThreadWeaver is trying to do. But we need to
solve a simpler problem first.
And besides, you can always do:
QFutureWatcher<T> w = runFunction(...);
w.connect(&QFutureWatcher<T>::finished, []() { other function goes here });
w.connect(&QFutureWatcher<T>::finished, w, &QObject::deleteLater);
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
