On Monday, March 25, 2013 10:46:37 Alan Alpert wrote: > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Konstantin Ritt <ritt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Can't it be a private API in 5.1? > > That's a good idea. Why didn't I think of that? That also provides > more flexibility while working towards unification. > > If it goes in as private API, does it still fall subject to the > feature freeze? Or would feature freeze only apply to its attempt to > go public next release?
Is it possible for this to be private? How would blackberry/plasma use it? If they can't use it, then why rush it in? Thanks, -- Stephen Kelly <stephen.ke...@kdab.com> | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
