On Monday, February 25, 2013 17:12:02 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On Monday, February 25, 2013 08:07:48 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > It was a matter of timing. Since GCC 4.8 is not released yet, I can't make
> > the  case for it being a P1.
> 
> I fully disagree with that :). I think compile fixes for compilers that are
> not released yet qualify.
> 
> But what's done is done, and you can disagree with what I think too.

The 'not released' compiler became 'the released compiler', by the way.

So unless d9ff510f02bba63dabe7a081a68296056a89ae4c is cherry-picked to the 
release branch, 5.0.2 will not build with GCC 4.8, right?

Thanks,

-- 
Stephen Kelly <stephen.ke...@kdab.com> | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to