On terça-feira, 7 de maio de 2013 08.25.48, Koehne Kai wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia....@qt-project.org > > [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia....@qt-project.org] On > > Behalf Of Alan Alpert > > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 8:30 AM > > To: Thiago Macieira > > Cc: development > > Subject: Re: [Development] 6 conflicting symbols between QtQuick 1 and 2 > > > > [...] > > I agree. I'm just waiting for someone to push the patch to codereview. > > Since apparently nobody has picked the ball up, I uploaded > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,55521,patchset=5 > > for review, which implements Olivier's suggestion (as far as I understood > it). > > Anyhow, would be good if actually someone tests that it resolves the issue > :) Because QtQml and QtDeclarative still exports the same symbols, even if > apps compiled against this patch shouldn't use the QtQUick1 exports any > more.
Thanks Kai for stepping up. I wonder if we should make the same change to QtQml. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
