On quinta-feira, 9 de maio de 2013 19.36.45, Justin Karneges wrote: > > QHostInfo has a short-lived cache, so it should work. > > Mmmm, if QHostInfo's cache behaves like any other DNS cache then I don't > see this making a difference. Unless every cache hit causes the cache > time to extend, there's always a chance for expiration between two resolves.
It doesn't work like a DNS cache. It has a minimum cache time of 60 seconds. In other words, it might disobey the TTL. > Also, I'm not using QHostInfo, but rather my own resolver JDNS, because > I want the resolutions to be event-driven. What do you mean by that? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
