On quinta-feira, 6 de junho de 2013 17.57.08, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> for the packagers, it would be the best solution to simply include the
> docs directly into the particular source tarballs. we have been doing
> that in ancient times. and its consistent with shipping the syncqt'd
> headers, and configure.exe, even if for somewhat different reasons (the
> general theme being "simplicity for the user").

Right.

The drawback is a major increase in the size of those tarballs.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to