On Monday, June 10, 2013 11:46:24 Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2013-06-10, Stephen Kelly <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Not only do the paths to the private headers not exist where expected,
> > they do not exist at all. The Qt installation on Mac, when using the
> > default config option -frameworks, does not install the private headers.
> > Apparently it's a known issue, but is not scheduled to be solved.
> > 
> > So, the error reported by CMake is correct. The installation of Qt is
> > broken.
> I'm not sure the lack of private headers should be considered 'broken'.
> The entire concept of 'private public headers' is, on the other hand,
> quite a issue and should be avoided as much as possible.

That's separate. 

The result is different to the intent on one platform/configuration. 

That's the brokenness.

Thanks,

-- 
Stephen Kelly <[email protected]> | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to