On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:44:58AM +0200, Stephen Kelly wrote: > Em, what? > > I suppose you didn't read the patch. Am I correct? > > The patch *only* has an effect for people using C++11, where it is redundant > because of std::unique_ptr. > > The original patch only tries to make QScopedPointer something it's not. >
Another thing to keep in mind is that QScopedPointer is also partially redundant with std::auto_ptr. Yet, it exists and people use it instead. QScopedPointer is also used in many classes as a member, which conflicts with its name, and it does that job pretty well anyway. The way I see it is that its name is just too specific to encapsulate all the situations where it can be useful. My name is Jocelyn, it's a girl name in english speaking countries, but that doesn't mean I should behave like a girl there. Just my 2 cents. Cheers, Jocelyn _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
