On 22.10.13 08:09, "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote:

>On terça-feira, 22 de outubro de 2013 06:05:13, Hausmann Simon wrote:
>> I think the problem is shipping binaries that accommodate the fact that
>> every distro ships libudev in a different major version. That means you
>> can't reliably use dynamic linking
>
>Right.
>
>There are two major versions of libudev in use in major distros:
>libudev.so.0 
>and libudev.so.1. The new one has been in use for about a year, so we can
>expect the need to support both versions for the next few years of builds.

Isn't the old version still available on new distroibutions for backwards
compatibility? In that case we could simply use the old version for the
time being.

Cheers,
Lars

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to