1) well, it can go to qt base, but what module? We can't add mount and monitor to qtcore, because Linux implementation will require dbus. 2) separate, see above. Drive info should belong to qt core, IMHO.
Иван Комиссаров 13 янв. 2014 г., в 21:53, Tony Van Eerd <tvane...@blackberry.com> написал(а): >> >>> On 13 Jan 2014, at 5:06 PM, Alvin Yulo wrote: >>> >>> Here are the QDrive APIs that Tony mentioned below: >>> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,75336,patchset=1 >> >> Cool. >> >> But I think maybe we should get the C++ APIs into qtbase, so that >> QtQuick.Controls.FileDialog doesn't depend on qtsystems. So does that >> mean we need the watchers added on top of https://codereview.qt- >> project.org/#change,73945 ? > > Yes. > > To decide: > - does it all into qtbase (ie yes!) > - do we want QDrive and QDriveInfo separate or together as one class > - naming - ie use the same naming throughout > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential > information, privileged material (including material protected by the > solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public > information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended > recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, > please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your > system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this > transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
