On 01/17/2014 08:54 AM, Knoll Lars wrote: > From a feature point of view it would fit best into Qt Network. But > it's a sizeable piece of code added to Qt Network. Do you have any > numbers on how this changes the size of Qt Network? > > Peter and Rich, and comments from your side?
Size-wise I think it is ok; we could add QT_NO_WEBSOCKETS defines or so if somebody wants to exclude it. Also the API looks clean and very similar to our current socket APIs; IIRC Shane did some review already, I did not look into it closely. One thing I have been wondering about wrt web sockets is: Where are they actually used? I am not saying they are not, but I have never come across a big site (Facebook, Twitter etc.) that offered clients to use it. The only thing I have found is this rather outdated discussion, which mentions a few sites: http://www.quora.com/Which-sites-are-using-websockets-right-now Again, I am not saying we don't want it; I just want to gain some more understanding on whether we want it directly in QtNetwork... Another thing: Kurt, would you be willing to maintain this part of the code? I probably will not be looking into it too much until it benefits my employer (i.e. if some BlackBerry app is using it). Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------- This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development