On Saturday 22. February 2014 18.04.01 Jason McDonald wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Sze Howe Koh <szehowe....@gmail.com>wrote: > > The following functions/types need documenting. (This list excludes > > constructors, destructors, and operators). Could those who are > > familiar with these functions/types please add them? > > Thanks for the info. The QTest items are genuine errors. Most of them are > related to overloaded functions, so it could be helpful for the future if > your script includes the full signatures in the output. > > I have prepared a patch to fix the QTest items -- > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,78977 > > I also notice that there seems to be a Qt Doc Bot that comments on gerrit > commits that reduce the number of qdoc errors. Is there anywhere that the > set of errors seen by that bot is made visible?
Sure. Just run make docs and you see what the doc bot see. It does just that - run make docs before and after a patch and compares the output, complaining about added lines (after sorting them). I agree though that we should make it easier to see all qdoc errors somewhere. Greetings, Frederik _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
