Since there was no further followup and no arguments against Kai's proposal, I think we can just agree on the issue as settled :)
Fredag 11. april 2014 06.31.18 skrev Koehne Kai: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia....@qt-project.org > > [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia....@qt-project.org] On > > Behalf Of Frederik Gladhorn > > Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 7:21 PM > > To: development@qt-project.org > > Subject: [Development] Categorized logging inside Qt > > > > Hi all, > > > > I just started to port accessibility to the new and shiny categorized > > logging. > > http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2014/03/11/qt-weekly-1-categorized-logging/ > > > > I'd propose we decide on a certain style of declaring categories. > > We had some discussion about names at > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#patch,sidebyside,74862,1,src/corelib/io/q > core_logging_p.h > > (which wasn't integrated due to other discussions/waiting changes). > > There was no real consensus, but the latest proposal was to use e.g. > > Q_LOGGING_CATEGORY(qtCoreIo, "qt.core.io"); > > And declare /define them all in a qxxx_logging_p.h qxxx_logging.cpp file per > module/plugin. I propose to follow this convention and make it the standard. -- Best regards, Frederik Gladhorn Senior Software Engineer - Digia, Qt Visit us on: http://qt.digia.com _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development