Hmm, but why don't you use Qml like that then? The language doesn't force you to use inline js code, does it?
A lot of the work that has gone into the engine lately also enables this to work better and reduce the use of JS. For example bindings that just consist of a qsTr don't actually end up creating any js bindings. Simon Opprinnelig melding Fra: Yves Bailly Sendt: 16:52 søndag 27. april 2014 Til: development@qt-project.org Emne: Re: [Development] Question about Qt's future On 27/04/2014 12:55, Peter Kümmel wrote: > Having imperative code on the JS side is also the root of the rejection of QML > for many C++ developers. If QML would have been just a improved .ui nobody > would > have complained. +1 -- (o< | Yves Bailly | -o) //\ | Linux Dijon : http://www.coagul.org | //\ \_/ | | \_/` _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
