On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:20:10PM +0200, André Pönitz wrote: > This code does not belong into Qt Base, > if you accept that the library is an improvement over the 6 copies we have all over the place, the question is only where, not if. if you insist on making it a separate repository, we'll have a tiny repo which is an additional dependency of quick1 and declarative, and which just adds additional burden to any release-related activities. i wonder who'd benefit from *that*.
> nor should it be advertised as a re-usable framework. > that decision is orthogonal to the physical location. or seen from a different angle, it would be harder to "hide" it if it was a separate module (well, not really, we did that with qtjsbackend). but then, i'd totally advocate a git submodule. there would be complaining how badly this stuff is integrated into the git ui, and we'd have to make a few adjustments here and there, but overall the solution is workable. then i could finally get rid of the three copies of the qmake evaluator, too ... _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
