On 19.05.2014 10:57, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 05:29:56PM +0200, Adam Strzelecki wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I wonder if there was any work done in regards of making Ninja Qmake >> generator. From my experience Ninja vastly improves (re)build time. > >> I wonder if it would be hard to make such generator, >> > yes. you'd need to do *massive* refactoring to make this feasible.
And nobody wanna dive into the qmake code ... So I assume there will be never ninja support in qmake. A compromise would be that cmake could read Qbs files. Then you get all CMake generators for free. And it is a step in the direction of adding a (declarative) language to cmake. > >> or if anyone tried to do it already. >> >> Cheers, >> -- >> Adam >> _______________________________________________ >> Development mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development > _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
