On 2 juin 2014, at 16:01, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote:
> Em seg 02 jun 2014, às 11:23:16, Oswald Buddenhagen escreveu: >> this sounds wrong to me. why would you need a "sandbox", i.e., something >> isolated, when it's pretty clear that this is one of the key missing >> features of qml/quick? you should aim at bringing this into the >> qtdeclarative repository, possibly directly into one of the existing >> modules. all the "sandboxing" you need is the review (series) you will >> create on gerrit anyway. > > I think the answer is pretty clear: because there are 10 other RPC solutions > and this needs to be harmonised. > > And, to be honest, a Qt-only solution is not the most ideal. I think we > should > use an RPC that is available in other toolkits. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > Aren't we getting the state machine thread mixed with the RPC thread ? _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
